Everybody loves ratings, especially if you’re in there. Most of the time you know it’s crap, but it’s a vanity thing I guess
Twitterholic is doing an automated hitlist, and you can filter by location. Here is the top 100 for Belgium. It’s bogus to start with because it only filters out these people who have “Belgium” as a location in twitter. People using like a city are left out.
What always bother me is that it’s just a rating by followers. Sure, this means something, big time. But it’s not the only thing that matters. If Stephen Fry is followed by almost 250k people, that’s big! Same goes for a lot of other people as you can see on the overall top 100 on Twitterholic.
What I think has some value as well is the following/followers ratio. And there’s 2 ways to look at. 1/ you can start following back people who start following you (polite) or 2/ just start following lots and lots of people and hope they’ll start following you back (or at least a decent chunk).
Don’t get me wrong, you obviously can follow as many people as you like, and there is absolutely no judgment. And I know there are people out there we live by it, and want the biggest possible gap between followers and following. Live and let live, but I don’t play these games. If somebody follows be I usually check that person shortly. If it’s somewhat interesting (for me) I might follow back. But I’m kind of picky because I simply can’t focus following too many people at once. Other than that, if I meet people, or I see them speech or something, and they have a twitter account, big chance I’ll follow them. I guess this is more or less how most people do it.
Because of this, I do think the ratio has some kind of value. I did some kind of experiment with it, and used the twitterholic numbers to calculate a different list.
1/ followers – following
Just a simple subtraction. Theory is to take only the number of people into account that are following you on top of the people you’re following yourselves. Here’s the new top 10 (Belgium)
Since this is dynamic I pasted the numbers in here as well. So this is a snapshot, and it will change for sure.
2/ followers/following ratio
Divide the numbers of followers by people that person is following, and you get a number indicating that for every people he/she follows, he’s followed back by x people. I left out the accounts that aren’t following anyone (this is just push, no conversation) and as well the radioo accounts (again, push).
#
|
who |
site |
followers |
following |
ratio |
1
|
Veerle Pieters |
Blog |
7313 |
192 |
38,09 |
2
|
Jan Van Boghout |
Macrabbit |
160 |
9 |
17,78 |
3
|
Paddy Donnelly |
Blog |
1231 |
182 |
6,76 |
4
|
Serge Jespers |
Blog |
1040 |
166 |
6,27 |
5
|
De Standaard Online |
Standaard (newspaper) |
180 |
35 |
5,14 |
6
|
Steven Pauwels |
Blog |
394 |
79 |
4,99 |
7
|
Kris Hoet |
Blog |
1009 |
206 |
4,9 |
8
|
Bart De Waele |
Blog |
1447 |
403 |
3,59 |
8
|
Appelogen |
Blog |
242 |
70 |
3,46 |
10
|
Juan Pablo |
Domain reactivator |
353 |
121 |
2,92 |
(I left out Christophe Logiste as well. Although in the Belgian list he seems to be French)
I think this worked out quite well. It’s not perfect though. How do you think this “algorithm” can be improved. Must be something with standard deviation I guess, because there are a few results that are kind of twisted.
It’s hard to determine, but there is like a number we have to take into acount. For example if you go over 500 followers this must mean something. On the other hand, following over 500 (even less) people can’t be efficient. Again: no judgment! But it is my believe that if you are following over 500 people it’s more to get your message out, over communication. Sure you can use tweetdeck or something else to structure the people you’re following, but this kind of just proves the point.
It’s just an open question: how can we optimize?
In any case, we can be pretty sure the most influential Belgian twitterer is Veerle Pieters. Totally deserved, she made herself count in the global design world.
I’m also pretty pleased I know more than a few of the people listed above quite good and in person. They’re people that definitely move things forward, and I praise them for that!
How am I doing?
In the original twitterholic list I’m number 44
Using the first tweak brings me to place 39
The second tweak puts me at 35
Going in the right direction, but still some work to do
You can follow me on twitter at http://twitter.com/minorissues